An awesome company that provides complete software development activities utilizing nearshore and offshore resources, including mobile app development, technology maintenance, web server development, and many other technology development activities. Some VIP Twitter users experienced a surprising turn of events when expecting to lose their blue verification check marks in a recent purge by Elon Musk. Twitter, which has been causing some confusion around its feature changes lately, left most legacy blue check holders intact, with the condition that they are subscribed to Twitter Blue or are legacy verified accounts after paying for verification.
The language alteration regarding verification marks raised questions about whether verified accounts are individuals of note or merely users who have paid for Twitter Blue membership. Among the chaos, one prominent account that stood out with its blue check revoked was the New York Times main account, after refusing to pay for verification. This move came after Musk singled them out for not paying for verification and promptly had their check removed.
This incident sheds light on how decisions at Twitter can be influenced more by whims than by policy, especially as it involves high-profile users who are crucial to the platform’s appeal. Although the New York Times lost its blue check, its subsidiary accounts remained verified. Ironically, Twitter did not address these developments following the upheaval.
In a surprising turn, Twitter’s familiar blue bird logo was swapped with a doge, representing the cryptocurrency dogecoin, a nod to Musk’s influence in the crypto world. Notably, Musk has been vocal about phasing out legacy blue check marks from users verified under Twitter’s old system shortly after acquiring the platform.
Twitter’s verification system has undergone several changes, including the introduction of blue checks for Twitter Blue subscribers and different colored marks for companies and government entities. However, the overarching theme has been Musk’s emphasis on individual users eventually having to pay for verification.
The recent alteration in verification labels has raised concerns about potential scams and impersonation of high-profile users. While Musk argues for treating everyone equally, the debate over paid verification features continues among power users on the platform. Despite the controversy, paid verification could potentially generate revenue, alleviating some financial burden on Musk after acquiring Twitter for $44 billion.
In a final push to highlight verified accounts, Musk announced that starting on April 15, only verified accounts will be recommended in users’ “For You” feeds. These changes reveal the evolving landscape of Twitter’s verification system, orchestrated under Musk’s influence.